Our Apologies!

The following features are not available with your current Browser configuration

- page navigation - memorize search form information - display database popup information - adjust limits on search form
Skip Navigation

PsycNET®


  • PsycARTICLES:
  • Citation and Abstract
Evaluating nicotine replacement therapy and stage-based therapies in a population-based effectiveness trial.
Velicer, Wayne F.; Friedman, Robert H.; Fava, Joseph L.; Gulliver, Suzy B.; Keller, Stefan; Sun, Xiaowu; Ramelson, Harley; Prochaska, James O.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Vol 74(6), Dec 2006, 1162-1172.
Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation are typically evaluated using volunteer samples (efficacy trials) but should also be evaluated in population-based trials (effectiveness trials). Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) alone and in combination with behavioral interventions was evaluated on a population of smokers from a New England Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Telephone interviews were completed with 3,239 smokers, and 2,054 agreed to participate (64%). Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: stage-matched manuals (MAN); NRT plus manuals (NRT = MAN); expert system plus NRT and manuals (EXP = NRT = MAN); and automated counseling plus NRT, manuals, and expert system (TEL = EXP = NRT = MAN). Assessments were completed at baseline, 10, 20, and 30 months. The point prevalence cessation rates at final follow-up (30 months) were MAN, 20.3%; NRT = MAN, 19.3%; EXP = NRT = MAN, 17.6%; and TEL = EXP = NRT = MAN, 19.9%. Stage-matched manuals provided cessation rates comparable with previous studies. The addition of NRT, expert system interventions, and automated telephone counseling failed to produce a further increase in intervention effectiveness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved)
  • Digital Object Identifier:
  • 10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1162
Note: Your library may have purchased access to this information through another service provider.